netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Don't force link when using in-band-status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:49:40 +0200
From:   Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Don't force link when using
 in-band-status

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:15:52 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 04:45:56PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> > When a port is configured with 'managed = "in-band-status"' don't force
> > the link up, the switch MAC will detect the link status correctly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>  
> 
> I thought we had issues with the 88E6390 where the PCS does not
> update the MAC with its results. Isn't this going to break the
> 6390? Andrew?
> 

Russell, I tested this patch on Turris MOX with 6390 on port 9 (cpu
port) which is configured in devicetree as 2500base-x, in-band-status,
and it works...

Or will this break on user ports?