netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 0/5] net: dsa: felix: psfp support on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201020133732.035d8df4@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:37:32 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, allan.nielsen@...rochip.com,
        joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        vinicius.gomes@...el.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
        vishal@...lsio.com, saeedm@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, po.liu@....com,
        claudiu.manoil@....com, alexandru.marginean@....com,
        vladimir.oltean@....com, leoyang.li@....com, mingkai.hu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 0/5] net: dsa: felix: psfp support on

On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:23:16 +0800 Xiaoliang Yang wrote:
> This patch series add gate and police action for tc flower offload to
> support Per-Stream Filtering and Policing(PSFP), which is defined in
> IEEE802.1Qci.
> 
> There is also a TC flower offload to set up VCAPs on ocelot driver.
> Because VCAPs use chain 10000-21255, we set chain 30000 to offload to
> gate and police action to run PSFP module.

We have already sent a pull request for 5.10 and therefore net-next 
is closed for new drivers, features, and code refactoring.

Please repost when net-next reopens after 5.10-rc1 is cut.

(http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html will not be up to date 
 this time around, sorry about that).

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.