netdev - RE: [PATCHv4 net-next 16/16] sctp: enable udp tunneling socks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:08:17 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner' <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Michael Tuexen <tuexen@...muenster.de>
CC:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv4 net-next 16/16] sctp: enable udp tunneling socks

From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> Sent: 20 October 2020 22:24
...
> > > Did FreeBSD enable it by default too?
> > No. The default is 0, which means that the encapsulation is turned off.
> > Setting this sysctl variable to a non-zero value enables the UDP tunneling
> > with the given port.
> 
> Thanks Michael.
> Xin, then we should change this default value (and update the
> documentation above accordingly, to still have the standard port #
> readily available in there).

Does that mean that you can't have some 'normal' connections and
others that use UDP encapsulation?
Seems a pretty strong restriction.

(I'm waiting for one of our customers to ask for this...)

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)