[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0d79083b43d212351d56718a0ec40d8e9b4888b.camel@blackwall.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:24:21 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,v2 4/9] bridge: resolve forwarding path for
bridge devices
On Thu, 2020-10-15 at 18:30 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Add .ndo_fill_forward_path for bridge devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
> ---
> v2: no changes
>
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 +
> net/bridge/br_device.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index d4263ed5dd79..4cabdbc672d3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -836,6 +836,7 @@ typedef u16 (*select_queue_fallback_t)(struct net_device *dev,
> enum net_device_path_type {
> DEV_PATH_ETHERNET = 0,
> DEV_PATH_VLAN,
> + DEV_PATH_BRIDGE,
> };
>
> struct net_device_path {
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c b/net/bridge/br_device.c
> index 6f742fee874a..06046a35868d 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_device.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c
> @@ -391,6 +391,27 @@ static int br_del_slave(struct net_device *dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
> return br_del_if(br, slave_dev);
> }
>
> +static int br_fill_forward_path(struct net_device_path_ctx *ctx,
> + struct net_device_path *path)
> +{
> + struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *f;
> + struct net_bridge *br;
> +
> + if (netif_is_bridge_port(ctx->dev))
> + return -1;
> +
> + br = netdev_priv(ctx->dev);
> + f = br_fdb_find_rcu(br, ctx->daddr, 0);
> + if (!f || !f->dst)
> + return -1;
> +
> + path->type = DEV_PATH_BRIDGE;
> + path->dev = f->dst->br->dev;
> + ctx->dev = f->dst->dev;
Please use READ_ONCE() for f->dst since it can become NULL if the entry
is changed to point to the bridge device itself after the check above. I've had
a patch in my queue that changes the bridge to use WRITE_ONCE() to annotate it
as a lockless read.
Thanks,
Nik
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct ethtool_ops br_ethtool_ops = {
> .get_drvinfo = br_getinfo,
> .get_link = ethtool_op_get_link,
> @@ -425,6 +446,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops br_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_bridge_setlink = br_setlink,
> .ndo_bridge_dellink = br_dellink,
> .ndo_features_check = passthru_features_check,
> + .ndo_fill_forward_path = br_fill_forward_path,
> };
>
> static struct device_type br_type = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists