[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201022165249.0d8079ce@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, secdev@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [net 6/7] ch_ktls/cxgb4: handle partial tag alone SKBs
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:40:18 +0530 Rohit Maheshwari wrote:
> If TCP congestion caused a very small packets which only has some
> part fo the TAG, and that too is not till the end. HW can't handle
> such case, so falling back to sw crypto in such cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Maheshwari <rohitm@...lsio.com>
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c: At top level:
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c:1864:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘chcr_ktls_sw_fallback’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1864 | int chcr_ktls_sw_fallback(struct sk_buff *skb, struct chcr_ktls_info *tx_info,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c:1864:5: warning: symbol 'chcr_ktls_sw_fallback' was not declared. Should it be static?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists