netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 15/15] dcb: Add a subtool for the DCB ETS object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AE43B7AF-6B32-4FFB-B111-6D63C843EE03@pmachata.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:16:58 +0200
From:   Petr Machata <me@...chata.org>
To:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        dsahern@...il.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, jiri@...dia.com,
        idosch@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 15/15] dcb: Add a subtool for the DCB ETS object



On October 22, 2020 2:11:01 AM GMT+02:00, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
>On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 01:48:58 +0200
>Petr Machata <me@...chata.org> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:43:37 +0200
>> > Petr Machata <me@...chata.org> wrote:
>> >  
>> >> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:
>> >>  
>> >> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 02:58:23 +0200 Petr Machata wrote:  
>> >> >> +static void dcb_ets_print_cbs(FILE *fp, const struct ieee_ets
>*ets)
>> >> >> +{
>> >> >> +	print_string(PRINT_ANY, "cbs", "cbs %s ", ets->cbs ? "on" :
>"off");
>> >> >> +}  
>> >> >
>> >> > I'd personally lean in the direction ethtool is taking and try
>to limit
>> >> > string values in json output as much as possible. This would be
>a good
>> >> > fit for bool.  
>> >>
>> >> Yep, makes sense. The value is not user-toggleable, so the on /
>off
>> >> there is just arbitrary.
>> >>
>> >> I'll consider it for "willing" as well. That one is
>user-toggleable, and
>> >> the "on" / "off" makes sense for consistency with the command
>line. But
>> >> that doesn't mean it can't be a boolean in JSON.  
>> >
>> > There are three ways of representing a boolean. You chose the
>worst.
>> > Option 1: is to use a json null value to indicate presence.
>> >       this works well for a flag.
>> > Option 2: is to use json bool.
>> > 	this looks awkward in non-json output
>> > Option 3: is to use a string
>> >      	but this makes the string output something harder to consume
>> > 	in json.  
>> 
>> What seems to be used commonly for these on/off toggles is the
>following
>> pattern:
>> 
>> 	print_string(PRINT_FP, NULL, "willing %s ", ets->willing ? "on" :
>"off");
>> 	print_bool(PRINT_JSON, "willing", NULL, true);
>> 
>> That way the JSON output is easy to query and the FP output is
>obvious
>> and compatible with the command line. Does that work for you?
>
>Yes, that is hybrid, maybe it should be a helper function?

Yep, I'll do the same dance as for the other helpers in the patch set. Currently this is cut and pasted all over the place.