netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] sched/isolation: Extend nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201023132950.GA47962@lothringen>
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:29:50 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        mtosatti@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, lihong.yang@...el.com,
        helgaas@...nel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
        jacob.e.keller@...el.com, jlelli@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, mike.marciniszyn@...el.com,
        dennis.dalessandro@...el.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        jiri@...dia.com, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, lgoncalv@...hat.com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] sched/isolation: Extend nohz_full to isolate
 managed IRQs

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 03:25:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:35:27PM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
> > Extend nohz_full feature set to include isolation from managed IRQS. This
> 
> So you say it's for managed-irqs, the feature is actually called
> MANAGED_IRQ, but, AFAICT, it does *NOT* in fact affect managed IRQs.
> 
> Also, as per Thomas' earlier points, managed-irqs are in fact perfectly
> fine and don't need help at at...
> 
> > is required specifically for setups that only uses nohz_full and still
> > requires isolation for maintaining lower latency for the listed CPUs.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>

Ah and yes there is this tag :-p

So that's my bad, I really thought this thing was about managed IRQ.
The problem is that I can't find a single documentation about them so I'm
too clueless on that matter.

Thanks.

> > Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/isolation.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> > index 5a6ea03f9882..9df9598a9e39 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
> > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int __init housekeeping_nohz_full_setup(char *str)
> >  	unsigned int flags;
> >  
> >  	flags = HK_FLAG_TICK | HK_FLAG_WQ | HK_FLAG_TIMER | HK_FLAG_RCU |
> > -		HK_FLAG_MISC | HK_FLAG_KTHREAD;
> > +		HK_FLAG_MISC | HK_FLAG_KTHREAD | HK_FLAG_MANAGED_IRQ;
> >  
> >  	return housekeeping_setup(str, flags);
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 2.18.2
> >