[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e535c07df407444880d8b678bc215d9f@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 21:30:59 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Stefano Garzarella' <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] vsock: ratelimit unknown ioctl error message
From: Stefano Garzarella
> Sent: 23 October 2020 15:10
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 01:21:13PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> >From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> >When exercising the kernel with stress-ng with some ioctl tests the
> >"Unknown ioctl" error message is spamming the kernel log at a high
> >rate. Rate limit this message to reduce the noise.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >---
> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >index 9e93bc201cc0..b8feb9223454 100644
> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >@@ -2072,7 +2072,7 @@ static long vsock_dev_do_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > break;
> >
> > default:
> >- pr_err("Unknown ioctl %d\n", cmd);
> >+ pr_err_ratelimited("Unknown ioctl %d\n", cmd);
>
> Make sense, or maybe can we remove the error message returning only the
> -EINVAL?
Isn't the canonical error for unknown ioctl codes -ENOTTY?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists