[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201023114502.GC1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:45:02 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mkl@...gutronix.de, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] add initial CAN PHY support
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:56:20PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> - The upcoming CAN SIC and CAN SIC XL PHYs use a different interface to
> the CAN controller. This means the controller needs to know which type
> of PHY is attached to configure the interface in the correct mode. Use
> PHY link for that, too.
Is this dynamic in some form?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists