lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:45:02 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk> To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>, David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>, kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mkl@...gutronix.de, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] add initial CAN PHY support On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:56:20PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > - The upcoming CAN SIC and CAN SIC XL PHYs use a different interface to > the CAN controller. This means the controller needs to know which type > of PHY is attached to configure the interface in the correct mode. Use > PHY link for that, too. Is this dynamic in some form? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists