netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] ethernet: m10-retimer: add support for retimers on Intel MAX 10 BMC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 24 Oct 2020 18:39:50 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc:     Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
        anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        mdf@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        lgoncalv@...hat.com, hao.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] ethernet: m10-retimer: add support for retimers
 on Intel MAX 10 BMC

On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 08:03:51AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
> 
> On 10/23/20 1:45 AM, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > This driver supports the ethernet retimers (Parkvale) for the Intel PAC
> > (Programmable Acceleration Card) N3000, which is a FPGA based Smart NIC.
> 
> Parkvale is a code name, it would be better if the public name was used.
> 
> As this is a physical chip that could be used on other cards,
> 
> I think the generic parts should be split out of intel-m10-bmc-retimer.c
> 
> into a separate file, maybe retimer-c827.c

This driver is not really a driver for the Parkvale. That driver is
hidden away in the BMC. So we need to be a bit careful with the name,
leaving it available for when somebody writes a real Linux driver for
retimer.

	Andrew