[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4415cfa-b43b-8606-e944-edeb00de06fc@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:36:36 -0700
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
mdf@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lgoncalv@...hat.com, hao.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] ethernet: m10-retimer: add support for retimers
on Intel MAX 10 BMC
On 10/24/20 9:39 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 08:03:51AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 10/23/20 1:45 AM, Xu Yilun wrote:
>>> This driver supports the ethernet retimers (Parkvale) for the Intel PAC
>>> (Programmable Acceleration Card) N3000, which is a FPGA based Smart NIC.
>> Parkvale is a code name, it would be better if the public name was used.
>>
>> As this is a physical chip that could be used on other cards,
>>
>> I think the generic parts should be split out of intel-m10-bmc-retimer.c
>>
>> into a separate file, maybe retimer-c827.c
> This driver is not really a driver for the Parkvale. That driver is
> hidden away in the BMC. So we need to be a bit careful with the name,
> leaving it available for when somebody writes a real Linux driver for
> retimer.
Then the parkvale verbage should be removed.
And the doc ascii diagram be updated with a
+---------+
| BMC |
| retimer |
+---------+
Tom
> Andrew
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists