lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 15:16:36 +0100 From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Steve McIntyre <steve@...val.com>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, "open list:BPF JIT for MIPS (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Willy Liu <willy.liu@...ltek.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org> Subject: Re: realtek PHY commit bbc4d71d63549 causes regression On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 17:45, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote: > > > However, that leaves the question why bbc4d71d63549bcd was backported, > > although I understand why the discussion is a bit trickier there. But > > if it did not fix a regression, only broken code that never worked in > > the first place, I am not convinced it belongs in -stable. > > Please ask Serge Semin what platform he tested on. I kind of expect it > worked for him, in some limited way, enough that it passed his > testing. > I'll make a note here that a rather large number of platforms got broken by the same fix for the Realtek PHY driver: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=bbc4d71d6354 I seriously doubt whether disabling TX/RX delay when it is enabled by h/w straps is the right thing to do here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists