netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v3 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ygnhzh4958o0.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:06:07 +0200
From:   Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Vlad Buslov <vlad@...lov.dev>,
        <stephen@...workplumber.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        <jiri@...nulli.us>, <ivecera@...hat.com>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v3 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump


On Mon 26 Oct 2020 at 16:52, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/20 5:28 AM, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> Patch to make cookie in filter terse dump optional? That would break
>> existing terse dump users that rely on it (OVS).
>
> Maybe I missed something in the discussions. terse dump for tc has not
> been committed to the tree yet, so there are no users relying on it.

What do you mean? Kernel terse dump flag and implementation have been
committed long time ago and are now present in released kernels.