lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:20:50 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix -Wshadow warnings

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

There are thousands of warnings about one macro in a W=2 build:

include/linux/filter.h:561:6: warning: declaration of 'ret' shadows a previous local [-Wshadow]

Prefix all the locals in that macro with __ to avoid most of
these warnings.

Fixes: 492ecee892c2 ("bpf: enable program stats")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
 include/linux/filter.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 954f279fde01..20ba04583eaa 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -558,21 +558,21 @@ struct sk_filter {
 DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(bpf_stats_enabled_key);
 
 #define __BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx, dfunc)	({			\
-	u32 ret;							\
+	u32 __ret;							\
 	cant_migrate();							\
 	if (static_branch_unlikely(&bpf_stats_enabled_key)) {		\
-		struct bpf_prog_stats *stats;				\
-		u64 start = sched_clock();				\
-		ret = dfunc(ctx, (prog)->insnsi, (prog)->bpf_func);	\
-		stats = this_cpu_ptr(prog->aux->stats);			\
-		u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);			\
-		stats->cnt++;						\
-		stats->nsecs += sched_clock() - start;			\
-		u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);			\
+		struct bpf_prog_stats *__stats;				\
+		u64 __start = sched_clock();				\
+		__ret = dfunc(ctx, (prog)->insnsi, (prog)->bpf_func);	\
+		__stats = this_cpu_ptr(prog->aux->stats);		\
+		u64_stats_update_begin(&__stats->syncp);		\
+		__stats->cnt++;						\
+		__stats->nsecs += sched_clock() - __start;		\
+		u64_stats_update_end(&__stats->syncp);			\
 	} else {							\
-		ret = dfunc(ctx, (prog)->insnsi, (prog)->bpf_func);	\
+		__ret = dfunc(ctx, (prog)->insnsi, (prog)->bpf_func);	\
 	}								\
-	ret; })
+	__ret; })
 
 #define BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx)						\
 	__BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx, bpf_dispatcher_nop_func)
-- 
2.27.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists