netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v3 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <370dd8e0-315b-04a5-c137-3b4f3cbd02a0@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:12:54 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
Cc:     Vlad Buslov <vlad@...lov.dev>, dsahern@...il.com,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        ivecera@...hat.com, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v3 2/2] tc: implement support for terse dump

On 2020-10-26 7:28 a.m., Vlad Buslov wrote:
> 
> On Sat 24 Oct 2020 at 20:40, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:

[..]
>>>
>>> Yes, that makes sense. I guess introducing something like 'tc action -br
>>> ls ..' mode implemented by means of existing terse flag + new 'also
>>> output action index' flag would achieve that goal.
>>>
>>
>> Right. There should be no interest in the cookie here at all. Maybe
>> it could be optional with a flag indication.
>> Have time to cook a patch? I'll taste/test it.
> 
> Patch to make cookie in filter terse dump optional? That would break
> existing terse dump users that rely on it (OVS).

Meant patch for 'tc action -br ls'

Which by default would not include the cookie.

cheers,
jamal