[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r1pjvh82.fsf@waldekranz.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:09:01 +0100
From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 15:00, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>> (mv88e6xxx) What is the policy regarding the use of DSA vs. EDSA? It
>> seems like all chips capable of doing EDSA are using that, except for
>> the Peridot.
>
> Hi Tobias
>
> Marvell removed the ability to use EDSA, in the way we do in Linux
> DSA, on Peridot. One of the configuration bits is gone. So i had to
> use DSA. It could be i just don't understand how to configure
> Peridot, and EDSA could be used, but i never figured it out.
>
> I will get back to your other questions.
>
> Andrew
Hi Andrew,
Very interesting! Which bit is that?
Looking at the datasheets for Agate and Peridot side-by-side, the
sections named "Ether Type DSA Tag" seem to be identical.
Thanks,
Tobias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists