[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201027225454.3492351-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:54:39 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Rain River <rain.1986.08.12@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Samuel Chessman <chessman@....org>,
Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 00/15] in_interrupt() cleanup, part 2
Folks,
in the discussion about preempt count consistency across kernel configurations:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de/
Linus clearly requested that code in drivers and libraries which changes
behaviour based on execution context should either be split up so that
e.g. task context invocations and BH invocations have different interfaces
or if that's not possible the context information has to be provided by the
caller which knows in which context it is executing.
This includes conditional locking, allocation mode (GFP_*) decisions and
avoidance of code paths which might sleep.
In the long run, usage of 'preemptible, in_*irq etc.' should be banned from
driver code completely.
This is part two addressing remaining drivers except for orinoco-usb.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists