[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201027013939.GA4042641@ubuntu-m3-large-x86>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:39:39 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@...ltek.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@...ltek.com>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Chin-Yen Lee <timlee@...ltek.com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH\ net] rtw88: fix fw dump support detection
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> clang points out a useless check that was recently added:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:1485:21: warning: address of array 'rtwdev->chip->fw_fifo_addr' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bool-conversion]
> if (!rtwdev->chip->fw_fifo_addr) {
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Apparently this was meant to check the contents of the array
> rather than the address, so check it accordingly.
>
> Fixes: 0fbc2f0f34cc ("rtw88: add dump firmware fifo support")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> index 042015bc8055..b2fd87834f23 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c
> @@ -1482,7 +1482,7 @@ static bool rtw_fw_dump_check_size(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> int rtw_fw_dump_fifo(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 fifo_sel, u32 addr, u32 size,
> u32 *buffer)
> {
> - if (!rtwdev->chip->fw_fifo_addr) {
> + if (!rtwdev->chip->fw_fifo_addr[0]) {
> rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_FW, "chip not support dump fw fifo\n");
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Tom sent an identical patch earlier that it does not look like Kalle has
picked up:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20201011155438.15892-1-trix@redhat.com/
Not that it particularly matters which one goes in so regardless:
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists