[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60e24a0e-0d72-51b3-216a-b3cf62fb1a58@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:03:24 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, lingshan.zhu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: Use mutex to protect vq_irq setup
On 2020/10/28 下午10:20, Eli Cohen wrote:
> Both irq_bypass_register_producer() and irq_bypass_unregister_producer()
> require process context to run. Change the call context lock from
> spinlock to mutex to protect the setup process to avoid deadlocks.
>
> Fixes: 265a0ad8731d ("vhost: introduce vhost_vring_call")
> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
Hi Eli:
During review we spot that the spinlock is not necessary. And it was
already protected by vq mutex. So it was removed in this commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=86e182fe12ee5869022614457037097c70fe2ed1
Thanks
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index be783592fe58..0a744f2b6e76 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -98,26 +98,26 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
> return;
>
> irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
> - spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0) {
> - spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> return;
> }
>
> vq->call_ctx.producer.token = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
> vq->call_ctx.producer.irq = irq;
> ret = irq_bypass_register_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> - spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> }
>
> static void vhost_vdpa_unsetup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
> {
> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &v->vqs[qid];
>
> - spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
> - spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> }
>
> static void vhost_vdpa_reset(struct vhost_vdpa *v)
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 9ad45e1d27f0..938239e11455 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static void vhost_vring_call_reset(struct vhost_vring_call *call_ctx)
> {
> call_ctx->ctx = NULL;
> memset(&call_ctx->producer, 0x0, sizeof(struct irq_bypass_producer));
> - spin_lock_init(&call_ctx->ctx_lock);
> + mutex_init(&call_ctx->ctx_lock);
> }
>
> static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> @@ -1650,9 +1650,9 @@ long vhost_vring_ioctl(struct vhost_dev *d, unsigned int ioctl, void __user *arg
> break;
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> swap(ctx, vq->call_ctx.ctx);
> - spin_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> break;
> case VHOST_SET_VRING_ERR:
> if (copy_from_user(&f, argp, sizeof f)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> index 9032d3c2a9f4..e8855ea04205 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ enum vhost_uaddr_type {
> struct vhost_vring_call {
> struct eventfd_ctx *ctx;
> struct irq_bypass_producer producer;
> - spinlock_t ctx_lock;
> + /* protect vq irq setup */
> + struct mutex ctx_lock;
> };
>
> /* The virtqueue structure describes a queue attached to a device. */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists