[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0Hc6+a=Ncf-_SS5rsPH5b5TuaGBTF6iqhqWhqrbF8jZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 16:29:46 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: rose: Escape trigraph to fix warning
with W=1
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:13 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:52:52PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Andrew Lunn
> > > Sent: 29 October 2020 14:31
>
> I think this trigraph issues popped up because of one of the changes
> you have in your playground, adding more warnings.
>
> What do you think of disabling the trigraph warning as well as
> disabling trigraphs themselves?
The trigraph warnings are currently disabled in mainline, and trigraphs
themselves are disabled in GCC unless explicitly enabled.
My series contained a patch that changes all trigraphs by adding
'\' characters, to let us no longer disable the warning and slightly
simplify the command line:
drivers/atm/idt77252.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_rd.c | 2 +-
drivers/mtd/maps/sun_uflash.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 2 +-
drivers/s390/block/dasd_proc.c | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/imm.c | 4 ++--
drivers/scsi/ppa.c | 4 ++--
drivers/tty/serial/sunsu.c | 2 +-
net/rose/af_rose.c | 4 ++--
sound/isa/msnd/msnd.c | 2 +-
Sorry you ran into this after you picked up the patches to the
Makefile but not my preparation patch.
I was unsure about whether this is worth changing, so I did not
send that one patch from my series and we can probably just
not drop the -Wno-trigraphs flag.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists