netdev - [PATCH] libbpf hashmap: Fix undefined behavior in hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201029160938.154084-1-irogers@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:09:38 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] libbpf hashmap: Fix undefined behavior in hash_bits

If bits is 0, the case when the map is empty, then the >> is the size of
the register which is undefined behavior - on x86 it is the same as a
shift by 0. Fix by handling the 0 case explicitly when running with
address sanitizer.

A variant of this patch was posted previously as:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200508063954.256593-1-irogers@google.com/

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h b/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
index d9b385fe808c..27d0556527d3 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
@@ -12,9 +12,23 @@
 #include <stddef.h>
 #include <limits.h>
 
+#ifdef __has_feature
+#define HAVE_FEATURE(f) __has_feature(f)
+#else
+#define HAVE_FEATURE(f) 0
+#endif
+
 static inline size_t hash_bits(size_t h, int bits)
 {
 	/* shuffle bits and return requested number of upper bits */
+#if defined(ADDRESS_SANITIZER) || HAVE_FEATURE(address_sanitizer)
+	/*
+	 * If the requested bits == 0 avoid undefined behavior from a
+	 * greater-than bit width shift right (aka invalid-shift-exponent).
+	 */
+	if (bits == 0)
+		return -1;
+#endif
 #if (__SIZEOF_SIZE_T__ == __SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__)
 	/* LP64 case */
 	return (h * 11400714819323198485llu) >> (__SIZEOF_LONG_LONG__ * 8 - bits);
-- 
2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog