netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mac80211: add KCOV remote annotations to incoming frame processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:42:06 +0300
From:   Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Aleksandr Nogikh <aleksandrnogikh@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] mac80211: add KCOV remote annotations to incoming
 frame processing

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:25 PM Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
[...]
> Wouldn't it make more sense to push that a layer down
> into ieee80211_rx_napi(), or actually now perhaps even
> better ieee80211_rx_list(), so we get it even if the driver called that
> API in the first place?
>
> You might only care about hwsim at this point, but perhaps hwsim would
> get optimised ..

Yes, ieee80211_rx_list() seems to be a reasonable place to move these
annotations to. Thanks for the suggestion.

I've incorporated this change into v5:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029173620.2121359-1-aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com