netdev - Re: [PATCH net] selftests: add test script for bareudp tunnels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+FuTSfs1ZsEuu4vKojEU_Bo=DibWDbPPXrw3f=2L6+UAr6UZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:11:38 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: add test script for bareudp tunnels

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:27 PM Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 07:05:19PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > Test different encapsulation modes of the bareudp module:
>
> BTW, I was assuming that kselftests were like documentation updates,
> and therefore always suitable for the net tree. If not, the patch
> applies cleanly to net-next (and I can also repost of course).

I think that's where it belongs.

Very nice test, I don't have any detailed comments. Just one high level:

Are all kernel dependencies for the test captured in
tools/testing/selftests/net/config? I think mirred is absent, for
instance