[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201029155348.1cb7555a@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:53:48 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: phy: mdio-i2c: support I2C MDIO
protocol for RollBall SFP modules
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:41:07 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:54:39PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > It would be good to pass this through checkpatch - I notice some lines
> > > seem to be over the 80 character limit now.
> >
> > Hi Russell
> >
> > The limit got raised to something higher. I personally prefer 80, and
> > if a file is using 80, new code would be inconsistent with old code if
> > it did not use 80. So your request is reasonable anyway.
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I do most of my kernel hacking on the Linux console, so 80x25 is the
> limit of what I see - and depending on the editor I'm using, lines
> longer than 80 characters are chopped to 80 characters unless I scroll
> to the right (which then makes moving up and down problematical.) So,
> the files I'm responsible for are likely to stay requiring an 80
> character width.
+1
Maybe we should patch checkpatch to still enforce 80 for networking.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists