netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 02/11] selftest/bpf: relax btf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201029005902.1706310-3-andrii@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:58:53 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC:     <andrii@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 02/11] selftest/bpf: relax btf_dedup test checks

Remove the requirement of a strictly exact string section contents. This used
to be true when string deduplication was done through sorting, but with string
dedup done through hash table, it's no longer true. So relax test harness to
relax strings checks and, consequently, type checks, which now don't have to
have exactly the same string offsets.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 34 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index 93162484c2ca..2ccc23b2a36f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
@@ -6652,7 +6652,7 @@ static void do_test_dedup(unsigned int test_num)
 	const void *test_btf_data, *expect_btf_data;
 	const char *ret_test_next_str, *ret_expect_next_str;
 	const char *test_strs, *expect_strs;
-	const char *test_str_cur, *test_str_end;
+	const char *test_str_cur;
 	const char *expect_str_cur, *expect_str_end;
 	unsigned int raw_btf_size;
 	void *raw_btf;
@@ -6719,12 +6719,18 @@ static void do_test_dedup(unsigned int test_num)
 		goto done;
 	}
 
-	test_str_cur = test_strs;
-	test_str_end = test_strs + test_hdr->str_len;
 	expect_str_cur = expect_strs;
 	expect_str_end = expect_strs + expect_hdr->str_len;
-	while (test_str_cur < test_str_end && expect_str_cur < expect_str_end) {
+	while (expect_str_cur < expect_str_end) {
 		size_t test_len, expect_len;
+		int off;
+
+		off = btf__find_str(test_btf, expect_str_cur);
+		if (CHECK(off < 0, "exp str '%s' not found: %d\n", expect_str_cur, off)) {
+			err = -1;
+			goto done;
+		}
+		test_str_cur = btf__str_by_offset(test_btf, off);
 
 		test_len = strlen(test_str_cur);
 		expect_len = strlen(expect_str_cur);
@@ -6741,15 +6747,8 @@ static void do_test_dedup(unsigned int test_num)
 			err = -1;
 			goto done;
 		}
-		test_str_cur += test_len + 1;
 		expect_str_cur += expect_len + 1;
 	}
-	if (CHECK(test_str_cur != test_str_end,
-		  "test_str_cur:%p != test_str_end:%p",
-		  test_str_cur, test_str_end)) {
-		err = -1;
-		goto done;
-	}
 
 	test_nr_types = btf__get_nr_types(test_btf);
 	expect_nr_types = btf__get_nr_types(expect_btf);
@@ -6775,10 +6774,15 @@ static void do_test_dedup(unsigned int test_num)
 			err = -1;
 			goto done;
 		}
-		if (CHECK(memcmp((void *)test_type,
-				 (void *)expect_type,
-				 test_size),
-			  "type #%d: contents differ", i)) {
+		if (CHECK(btf_kind(test_type) != btf_kind(expect_type),
+			  "type %d kind: exp %d != got %u\n",
+			  i, btf_kind(expect_type), btf_kind(test_type))) {
+			err = -1;
+			goto done;
+		}
+		if (CHECK(test_type->info != expect_type->info,
+			  "type %d info: exp %d != got %u\n",
+			  i, expect_type->info, test_type->info)) {
 			err = -1;
 			goto done;
 		}
-- 
2.24.1