netdev - Re: [tipc-discussion] [net v3 1/1] tipc: fix memory leak caused by tipc_buf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:29:01 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Tung Quang Nguyen <tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au>
Cc:     "tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tipc-discussion] [net v3 1/1] tipc: fix memory leak caused by tipc_buf_append()

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:23 PM Tung Quang Nguyen
<tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Cong,
>
> No, I have never ignored any comment from reviewers. I sent v2 on Oct 26 after discussing with Xin Long, and v3 on Oct 27 after receiving comment from Jakub.
> I received your 3 emails nearly at the same time on Oct 28. It's weird. Your emails did not appear in this email archive either: https://sourceforge.net/p/tipc/mailman/tipc-discussion/
>
> Anyway, I answer your questions:

Oh, I just realized you meant shinfo->dataref, not skb->users...
Then it makes sense now.

Thanks.