| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 18:51:15 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
CC: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <brakmo@...com>,
<alexanderduyck@...com>
Subject: Re: [bpf-next PATCH 2/4] selftests/bpf: Drop python client/server in
favor of threads
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 06:47:13PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
>
> Drop the tcp_client/server.py files in favor of using a client and server
> thread within the test case. Specifically we spawn a new thread to play the
> role of the server, and the main testing thread plays the role of client.
>
> Doing this we are able to reduce overhead since we don't have two python
> workers possibly floating around. In addition we don't have to worry about
> synchronization issues and as such the retry loop waiting for the threads
> to close the sockets can be dropped as we will have already closed the
> sockets in the local executable and synchronized the server thread.
Thanks for working on this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_client.py | 50 --------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_server.py | 80 -------------
> 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_client.py
> delete mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_server.py
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c
> index 5becab8b04e3..71ab82e37eb7 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c
> @@ -1,14 +1,65 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> #include <inttypes.h>
> #include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <network_helpers.h>
>
> #include "test_tcpbpf.h"
> #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
>
> +#define LO_ADDR6 "::1"
> #define CG_NAME "/tcpbpf-user-test"
>
> -/* 3 comes from one listening socket + both ends of the connection */
> -#define EXPECTED_CLOSE_EVENTS 3
> +static pthread_mutex_t server_started_mtx = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
> +static pthread_cond_t server_started = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
> +
> +static void *server_thread(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct sockaddr_storage addr;
> + socklen_t len = sizeof(addr);
> + int fd = *(int *)arg;
> + char buf[1000];
> + int client_fd;
> + int err = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + err = listen(fd, 1);
This is not needed. start_server() has done it.
> +
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&server_started_mtx);
> + pthread_cond_signal(&server_started);
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&server_started_mtx);
> +
> + if (err < 0) {
> + perror("Failed to listen on socket");
> + err = errno;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + client_fd = accept(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &len);
> + if (client_fd < 0) {
> + perror("Failed to accept client");
> + err = errno;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (recv(client_fd, buf, 1000, 0) < 1000) {
> + perror("failed/partial recv");
> + err = errno;
> + goto out_clean;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 500; i++)
> + buf[i] = '.';
> +
> + if (send(client_fd, buf, 500, 0) < 500) {
> + perror("failed/partial send");
> + err = errno;
> + goto out_clean;
> + }
> +out_clean:
> + close(client_fd);
> +err:
> + return (void *)(long)err;
> +}
>
> #define EXPECT_EQ(expected, actual, fmt) \
> do { \
> @@ -43,7 +94,9 @@ int verify_result(const struct tcpbpf_globals *result)
> EXPECT_EQ(0x80, result->bad_cb_test_rv, PRIu32);
> EXPECT_EQ(0, result->good_cb_test_rv, PRIu32);
> EXPECT_EQ(1, result->num_listen, PRIu32);
> - EXPECT_EQ(EXPECTED_CLOSE_EVENTS, result->num_close_events, PRIu32);
> +
> + /* 3 comes from one listening socket + both ends of the connection */
> + EXPECT_EQ(3, result->num_close_events, PRIu32);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -67,6 +120,52 @@ int verify_sockopt_result(int sock_map_fd)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int run_test(void)
> +{
> + int server_fd, client_fd;
> + void *server_err;
> + char buf[1000];
> + pthread_t tid;
> + int err = -1;
> + int i;
> +
> + server_fd = start_server(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, LO_ADDR6, 0, 0);
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(server_fd < 0))
> + return err;
> +
> + pthread_mutex_lock(&server_started_mtx);
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(pthread_create(&tid, NULL, server_thread,
> + (void *)&server_fd)))
> + goto close_server_fd;
> +
> + pthread_cond_wait(&server_started, &server_started_mtx);
> + pthread_mutex_unlock(&server_started_mtx);
> +
> + client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
> + if (client_fd < 0)
> + goto close_server_fd;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
> + buf[i] = '+';
> +
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(send(client_fd, buf, 1000, 0) < 1000))
> + goto close_client_fd;
> +
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(recv(client_fd, buf, 500, 0) < 500))
> + goto close_client_fd;
> +
> + pthread_join(tid, &server_err);
I think this can be further simplified without starting thread
and do everything in run_test() instead.
Something like this (uncompiled code):
accept_fd = accept(server_fd, NULL, 0);
send(client_fd, plus_buf, 1000, 0);
recv(accept_fd, recv_buf, 1000, 0);
send(accept_fd, dot_buf, 500, 0);
recv(client_fd, recv_buf, 500, 0);
> +
> + err = (int)(long)server_err;
> + CHECK_FAIL(err);
> +
> +close_client_fd:
> + close(client_fd);
> +close_server_fd:
> + close(server_fd);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> void test_tcpbpf_user(void)
> {
> const char *file = "test_tcpbpf_kern.o";
> @@ -74,7 +173,6 @@ void test_tcpbpf_user(void)
> struct tcpbpf_globals g = {0};
> struct bpf_object *obj;
> int cg_fd = -1;
> - int retry = 10;
> __u32 key = 0;
> int rv;
>
> @@ -94,11 +192,6 @@ void test_tcpbpf_user(void)
> goto err;
> }
>
> - if (CHECK_FAIL(system("./tcp_server.py"))) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "FAILED: TCP server\n");
> - goto err;
> - }
> -
> map_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "global_map");
> if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0))
> goto err;
> @@ -107,21 +200,17 @@ void test_tcpbpf_user(void)
> if (CHECK_FAIL(sock_map_fd < 0))
> goto err;
>
> -retry_lookup:
> + if (run_test()) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "FAILED: TCP server\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> rv = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &key, &g);
> if (CHECK_FAIL(rv != 0)) {
CHECK() is a better one here if it needs to output error message.
The same goes for similar usages in this patch set.
For the start_server() above which has already logged the error message,
CHECK_FAIL() is good enough.
> fprintf(stderr, "FAILED: bpf_map_lookup_elem returns %d\n", rv);
> goto err;
> }
>
> - if (g.num_close_events != EXPECTED_CLOSE_EVENTS && retry--) {
It is good to have a solution to avoid a test depending on some number
of retries.
After looking at BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB in test_tcpbpf_kern.c,
it is not clear to me removing python alone is enough to avoid the
race (so the retry--). One of the sk might still be in TCP_LAST_ACK
instead of TCP_CLOSE.
Also, when looking closer at BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB in test_tcpbpf_kern.c,
it seems the map value "gp" is slapped together across multiple
TCP_CLOSE events which may be not easy to understand.
How about it checks different states: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LAST_ACK,
and BPF_TCP_FIN_WAIT2. Each of this state will update its own
values under "gp". Something like this (only compiler tested on
top of patch 4):
diff --git i/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c w/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c
index 7e92c37976ac..65b247b03dfc 100644
--- i/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c
+++ w/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c
@@ -90,15 +90,14 @@ static void verify_result(int map_fd, int sock_map_fd)
result.event_map, expected_events);
ASSERT_EQ(result.bytes_received, 501, "bytes_received");
- ASSERT_EQ(result.bytes_acked, 1002, "bytes_acked");
+ ASSERT_EQ(result.bytes_acked, 1001, "bytes_acked");
ASSERT_EQ(result.data_segs_in, 1, "data_segs_in");
ASSERT_EQ(result.data_segs_out, 1, "data_segs_out");
ASSERT_EQ(result.bad_cb_test_rv, 0x80, "bad_cb_test_rv");
ASSERT_EQ(result.good_cb_test_rv, 0, "good_cb_test_rv");
- ASSERT_EQ(result.num_listen, 1, "num_listen");
-
- /* 3 comes from one listening socket + both ends of the connection */
- ASSERT_EQ(result.num_close_events, 3, "num_close_events");
+ ASSERT_EQ(result.num_listen_close, 1, "num_listen");
+ ASSERT_EQ(result.num_last_ack, 1, "num_last_ack");
+ ASSERT_EQ(result.num_fin_wait2, 1, "num_fin_wait2");
/* check setsockopt for SAVE_SYN */
key = 0;
diff --git i/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c w/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
index 3e6912e4df3d..2c5ffb50d6e0 100644
--- i/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
+++ w/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c
@@ -55,9 +55,11 @@ int bpf_testcb(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
{
char header[sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + sizeof(struct tcphdr)];
struct bpf_sock_ops *reuse = skops;
+ struct tcpbpf_globals *gp;
struct tcphdr *thdr;
int good_call_rv = 0;
int bad_call_rv = 0;
+ __u32 key_zero = 0;
int save_syn = 1;
int rv = -1;
int v = 0;
@@ -155,26 +157,21 @@ int bpf_testcb(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
case BPF_SOCK_OPS_RETRANS_CB:
break;
case BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB:
- if (skops->args[1] == BPF_TCP_CLOSE) {
- __u32 key = 0;
- struct tcpbpf_globals g, *gp;
-
- gp = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&global_map, &key);
- if (!gp)
- break;
- g = *gp;
- if (skops->args[0] == BPF_TCP_LISTEN) {
- g.num_listen++;
- } else {
- g.total_retrans = skops->total_retrans;
- g.data_segs_in = skops->data_segs_in;
- g.data_segs_out = skops->data_segs_out;
- g.bytes_received = skops->bytes_received;
- g.bytes_acked = skops->bytes_acked;
- }
- g.num_close_events++;
- bpf_map_update_elem(&global_map, &key, &g,
- BPF_ANY);
+ gp = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&global_map, &key_zero);
+ if (!gp)
+ break;
+ if (skops->args[1] == BPF_TCP_CLOSE &&
+ skops->args[0] == BPF_TCP_LISTEN) {
+ gp->num_listen_close++;
+ } else if (skops->args[1] == BPF_TCP_LAST_ACK) {
+ gp->total_retrans = skops->total_retrans;
+ gp->data_segs_in = skops->data_segs_in;
+ gp->data_segs_out = skops->data_segs_out;
+ gp->bytes_received = skops->bytes_received;
+ gp->bytes_acked = skops->bytes_acked;
+ gp->num_last_ack++;
+ } else if (skops->args[1] == BPF_TCP_FIN_WAIT2) {
+ gp->num_fin_wait2++;
}
break;
case BPF_SOCK_OPS_TCP_LISTEN_CB:
diff --git i/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf.h w/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf.h
index 6220b95cbd02..0dec324ba4a6 100644
--- i/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf.h
+++ w/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf.h
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ struct tcpbpf_globals {
__u32 good_cb_test_rv;
__u64 bytes_received;
__u64 bytes_acked;
- __u32 num_listen;
- __u32 num_close_events;
+ __u32 num_listen_close;
+ __u32 num_last_ack;
+ __u32 num_fin_wait2;
};
#endif
I also noticed the bytes_received/acked depends on the order of close(),
i.e. always close the accepted fd first. I think a comment
in the tcpbpf_user.c is good enough for now.
[ It does not have to be in this set and it can be done in another
follow up effort.
Instead of using a bpf map to store the result, using global
variables in test_tcpbpf_kern.c will simplify the code further. ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists