netdev - Re: [PATCH net] selftests: add test script for bareudp tunnels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201030093903.GA5719@pc-2.home>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:39:03 +0100
From:   Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: add test script for bareudp tunnels

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:11:38PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:27 PM Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 07:05:19PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > > Test different encapsulation modes of the bareudp module:
> >
> > BTW, I was assuming that kselftests were like documentation updates,
> > and therefore always suitable for the net tree. If not, the patch
> > applies cleanly to net-next (and I can also repost of course).
> 
> I think that's where it belongs.

Hum, do you mean to net or to net-next?

> Very nice test, I don't have any detailed comments. Just one high level:
> 
> Are all kernel dependencies for the test captured in
> tools/testing/selftests/net/config? I think mirred is absent, for
> instance

Thanks! I didn't realise that we had this config file. I'll add the
build dependencies in v2.