lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSe2GYxxX2hckeYwiDjBfCdF-ZXXqizRF=ATboLZAAdaJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 08:57:00 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: add test script for bareudp tunnels

On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:39 AM Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:11:38PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:27 PM Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 07:05:19PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > > > Test different encapsulation modes of the bareudp module:
> > >
> > > BTW, I was assuming that kselftests were like documentation updates,
> > > and therefore always suitable for the net tree. If not, the patch
> > > applies cleanly to net-next (and I can also repost of course).
> >
> > I think that's where it belongs.
>
> Hum, do you mean to net or to net-next?

Sorry, that wasn't very clear. I meant net-next

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ