netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] in_interrupt() cleanup, part 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201030112900.08bd1750@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date:   Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:29:00 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Aymen Sghaier <aymen.sghaier@....com>,
        Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
        Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>,
        Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        Rain River <rain.1986.08.12@...il.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Samuel Chessman <chessman@....org>,
        Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>,
        Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] in_interrupt() cleanup, part 2

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 23:54:39 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> in the discussion about preempt count consistency across kernel configurations:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de/
> 
> Linus clearly requested that code in drivers and libraries which changes
> behaviour based on execution context should either be split up so that
> e.g. task context invocations and BH invocations have different interfaces
> or if that's not possible the context information has to be provided by the
> caller which knows in which context it is executing.
> 
> This includes conditional locking, allocation mode (GFP_*) decisions and
> avoidance of code paths which might sleep.
> 
> In the long run, usage of 'preemptible, in_*irq etc.' should be banned from
> driver code completely.
> 
> This is part two addressing remaining drivers except for orinoco-usb.

Freescale folks - can I get an ack for merging the last three patches
into net-next?