[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201030142852.7d41eecc@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 14:28:52 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: openvswitch: silence suspicious RCU usage
warning
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:53:21 +0100 Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> Silence suspicious RCU usage warning in ovs_flow_tbl_masks_cache_resize()
> by replacing rcu_dereference() with rcu_dereference_ovsl().
>
> In addition, when creating a new datapath, make sure it's configured under
> the ovs_lock.
>
> Fixes: 9bf24f594c6a ("net: openvswitch: make masks cache size configurable")
> Reported-by: syzbot+9a8f8bfcc56e8578016c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
> ---
> net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 8 ++++----
> net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> index 832f898edb6a..020f8539fede 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
> @@ -1695,6 +1695,9 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> if (err)
> goto err_destroy_ports;
>
> + /* So far only local changes have been made, now need the lock. */
> + ovs_lock();
Should we move the lock below assignments to param?
Looks a little strange to protect stack variables with a global lock.
> /* Set up our datapath device. */
> parms.name = nla_data(a[OVS_DP_ATTR_NAME]);
> parms.type = OVS_VPORT_TYPE_INTERNAL;
> @@ -1707,9 +1710,6 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> if (err)
> goto err_destroy_meters;
>
> - /* So far only local changes have been made, now need the lock. */
> - ovs_lock();
> -
> vport = new_vport(&parms);
> if (IS_ERR(vport)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(vport);
> @@ -1725,7 +1725,6 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> ovs_dp_reset_user_features(skb, info);
> }
>
> - ovs_unlock();
> goto err_destroy_meters;
> }
>
> @@ -1742,6 +1741,7 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return 0;
>
> err_destroy_meters:
Let's update the name of the label.
> + ovs_unlock();
> ovs_meters_exit(dp);
> err_destroy_ports:
> kfree(dp->ports);
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> index f3486a37361a..c89c8da99f1a 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static struct mask_cache *tbl_mask_cache_alloc(u32 size)
> }
> int ovs_flow_tbl_masks_cache_resize(struct flow_table *table, u32 size)
> {
> - struct mask_cache *mc = rcu_dereference(table->mask_cache);
> + struct mask_cache *mc = rcu_dereference_ovsl(table->mask_cache);
> struct mask_cache *new;
>
> if (size == mc->cache_size)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists