netdev - Re: [PATCH nf 0/2] route_me_harder routing loop with tunnels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201031010003.GA27601@salvia>
Date:   Sat, 31 Oct 2020 02:00:03 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf 0/2] route_me_harder routing loop with tunnels

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 01:05:03AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 8:23 PM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:56:04AM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > Hi Pablo,
> > >
> > > This series fixes a bug in the route_me_harder family of functions with
> > > regards to tunnel interfaces. The first patch contains an addition to
> > > the wireguard test suite; I normally send my wireguard patches through
> > > Dave's tree, but I thought it'd be nice to send these together here
> > > because the test case is illustrative of the issue. The second patch
> > > then fixes the issue with a lengthy explanation of what's going on.
> > >
> > > These are intended for net.git/nf.git, not the -next variety, and to
> > > eventually be backported to stable. So, the second patch has a proper
> > > Fixes: line on it to help with that.
> >
> > Series applied, thanks.
> 
> To nf.git?

Yes.

> Did you forget to git-push perhaps?

I usually take a little time to compile test and run tests before
pushing it out.