netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: phy: dp83td510: Add support for the DP83TD510 Ethernet PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d51ef446-1528-5d3f-8548-831598a005a7@ti.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 11:23:57 -0600
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] net: phy: dp83td510: Add support for the
 DP83TD510 Ethernet PHY

Andrew

On 11/3/20 11:21 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:09:44AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> On 10/30/20 6:03 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:29:50 -0500 Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>> The DP83TD510E is an ultra-low power Ethernet physical layer transceiver
>>>> that supports 10M single pair cable.
>>>>
>>>> The device supports both 2.4-V p2p and 1-V p2p output voltage as defined
>>>> by IEEE 802.3cg 10Base-T1L specfications. These modes can be forced via
>>>> the device tree or the device is defaulted to auto negotiation to
>>>> determine the proper p2p voltage.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>>> drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:70:11: warning: symbol 'dp83td510_feature_array' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> I did not see this warning. Did you use W=1?
> I _think_ that one is W=1. All the PHY drivers are W=1 clean, and i
> want to keep it that way. And i hope to make it the default in a lot
> of the network code soon.
OK I built with the W=1 before submission I did not see this but I will 
try some other things.
>>> Also this:
>>>
>>> WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP
>>> #429: FILE: drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:371:
>>> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
>>>
>>> WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP
>>> #524: FILE: drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:466:
>>> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
>> Same with these warnings how where they reproduced?
Same as above
>>> ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
>>> #580: FILE: drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:522:
>>> +		if(phydev->autoneg) {
>>>
>>> ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
>>> #588: FILE: drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c:530:
>>> +		if(phydev->autoneg) {
>>>
> These look like checkpatch.
These I missed
>>> And please try to wrap the code on 80 chars on the non trivial lines:
>> What is the LoC limit for networking just for my clarification and I will
>> align with that.
> 80. I would not be too surprised to see checkpatch getting a patch to
> set it to 80 for networking code.

OK I will align the lines to 80 then.

Dan


>      Andrew