[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3368c04-2887-3daf-8be8-8717960e9a18@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:32:37 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
<toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 iproute2-next 1/5] configure: add check_libbpf() for
later libbpf support
On 11/2/20 10:54 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:37:37AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 10/29/20 9:11 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>>> This patch adds a check to see if we support libbpf. By default the
>>> system libbpf will be used, but static linking against a custom libbpf
>>> version can be achieved by passing LIBBPF_DIR to configure. FORCE_LIBBPF
>>> can be set to force configure to abort if no suitable libbpf is found,
>>> which is useful for automatic packaging that wants to enforce the
>>> dependency.
>>>
>>
>> Add an option to force libbpf off and use of the legacy code. i.e, yes
>> it is installed, but don't use it.
>>
>> configure script really needs a usage to dump options like disabling libbpf.
>>
>
> Shouldn't we use libbpf by default if system support? The same like libmnl.
> There is no options to force libnml off.
>
configure scripts usually allow you to control options directly,
overriding the autoprobe.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists