[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+EWmmjec08Y6JZGnan=H8=X60LVtwjtvjO5C6M-jcfpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 09:47:00 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 iproute2-next 0/5] iproute2: add libbpf support
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 9:36 AM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/3/20 1:46 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > I thought last time this discussion came up there was consensus that the
> > submodule could be an explicit opt in for the configure script at least?
>
> I do not recall Stephen agreeing to that, and I certainly did not.
Daniel,
since David is deaf to technical arguments,
how about we fork iproute2 and maintain it separately?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists