[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR18MB267934F9299BE9E390B17A55C5110@BYAPR18MB2679.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:59:19 +0000
From: George Cherian <gcherian@...vell.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
"masahiroy@...nel.org" <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] octeontx2-af: Add devlink health reporters
for NPA
Hi Willem,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 11:26 PM
> To: George Cherian <gcherian@...vell.com>
> Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; linux-kernel <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; David Miller
> <davem@...emloft.net>; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
> <sgoutham@...vell.com>; Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>;
> Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>; masahiroy@...nel.org
> Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] octeontx2-af: Add devlink health
> reporters for NPA
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:43 PM George Cherian <gcherian@...vell.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Willem,
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 7:21 PM
> > > To: George Cherian <gcherian@...vell.com>
> > > Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; linux-kernel
> > > <linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>;
> > > David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham
> > > <sgoutham@...vell.com>; Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>;
> > > Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>; masahiroy@...nel.org
> > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] octeontx2-af: Add devlink
> > > health reporters for NPA
> > >
> > > External Email
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > > > > static int rvu_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink,
> > > > > > struct
> > > > > devlink_info_req *req,
> > > > > > struct netlink_ext_ack
> > > > > > *extack) { @@
> > > > > > -53,7 +483,8 @@ int rvu_register_dl(struct rvu *rvu)
> > > > > > rvu_dl->dl = dl;
> > > > > > rvu_dl->rvu = rvu;
> > > > > > rvu->rvu_dl = rvu_dl;
> > > > > > - return 0;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return rvu_health_reporters_create(rvu);
> > > > >
> > > > > when would this be called with rvu->rvu_dl == NULL?
> > > >
> > > > During initialization.
> > >
> > > This is the only caller, and it is only reached if rvu_dl is non-zero.
> >
> > Did you mean to ask, where is it de-initialized?
> > If so, it should be done in rvu_unregister_dl() after freeing rvu_dl.
>
> No, I meant that rvu_health_reporters_create does not need an !rvu-
> >rvu_dl precondition test, as the only callers calls with with a non-zero
> rvu_dl.
Yes understood!!
Will fix in v2.
Thanks,
-George
Powered by blists - more mailing lists