lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:39:40 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc:     Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        Jeffrey Townsend <jeffrey.townsend@...switch.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        John W Linville <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethernet: igb: e1000_phy: Check for
 ops.force_speed_duplex existence

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:35:09 +0100 Paul Menzel wrote:
> According to *Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1* [3], it’s my 
> understanding, that it is *not* required. The items (a), (b), and (c) 
> are connected by an *or*.
> 
> >         (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
> >             of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
> >             license and I have the right under that license to submit that
> >             work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part 
> >             by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
> >             permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
> >             in the file; or  

Ack, but then you need to put yourself as the author, because it's
you certifying that the code falls under (b).

At least that's my understanding.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists