lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 10:39:40 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Jeffrey Townsend <jeffrey.townsend@...switch.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John W Linville <linville@...driver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethernet: igb: e1000_phy: Check for ops.force_speed_duplex existence On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:35:09 +0100 Paul Menzel wrote: > According to *Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1* [3], it’s my > understanding, that it is *not* required. The items (a), (b), and (c) > are connected by an *or*. > > > (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best > > of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source > > license and I have the right under that license to submit that > > work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part > > by me, under the same open source license (unless I am > > permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated > > in the file; or Ack, but then you need to put yourself as the author, because it's you certifying that the code falls under (b). At least that's my understanding.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists