[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKuoZDB-Xga5STHdGSxvSP=B6jQ40kLdpL1u+J98bv65A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 21:42:52 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Kenny Ho <y2kenny@...il.com>
Cc: Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@....com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_IOCTL
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 9:39 PM Kenny Ho <y2kenny@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply.
pls don't top post.
> Cgroup awareness is desired because the intent
> is to use this for resource management as well (potentially along with
> other cgroup controlled resources.) I will dig into bpf_lsm and learn
> more about it.
Also consider that bpf_lsm hooks have a way to get cgroup-id without
being explicitly scoped. So the bpf program can be made cgroup aware.
It's just not as convenient as attaching a prog to cgroup+hook at once.
For prototyping the existing bpf_lsm facility should be enough.
So please try to follow this route and please share more details about
the use case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists