netdev - Re: [PATCH 06/12] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-qos: Demote non-conformant function header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201104143838.GD1213539@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:38:38 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-qos: Demote
 non-conformant function header

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:28:35PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2020, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:06:04AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> > > 
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c:364: warning: Function parameter or member 'ndev' not described in 'am65_cpsw_timer_set'
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-qos.c:364: warning: Function parameter or member 'est_new' not described in 'am65_cpsw_timer_set'
> > > 
> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
> > > Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > 
> > I _think_ these have got missed so far in the various cleanup passes
> > because of missing COMPILE_TEST. I've been adding that as part of
> > fixing these warnings. When your respin, could you add that as well?
> 
> Yes, no problem.
> 
> Just for this symbol?

Hi Lee

I've not look at the Kbuild, but ideally so that all TI drivers get
built when COMPILE_TEST is true.

And this probably needs to happen for any patch i added a Reviewed-by:
because i missed them as well. I'm using COMPILE_TEST but just for arm
and x86, where as i guess you are using more randconfig builds, or
less popular architectures?

	Andrew