netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/12] net: ethernet: smsc: smc911x: Mark 'status' as __maybe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201104145600.GJ4488@dell>
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:56:00 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dustin McIntire <dustin@...soria.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] net: ethernet: smsc: smc911x: Mark 'status' as
 __maybe_unused

On Wed, 04 Nov 2020, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:31:40PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Nov 2020, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 09:06:00AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > 'status' is used to interact with a hardware register.  It might not
> > > > be safe to remove it entirely.  Mark it as __maybe_unused instead.
> > > 
> > > Hi Lee
> > > 
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg365875.html
> > > 
> > > I'm working on driver/net/ethernet and net to make it w=1 clean.  I
> > > suggest you hang out on the netdev mailing list so you don't waste
> > > your time reproducing what i am doing.
> > 
> > I believe that ship has sailed.  Net should be clean now.
> 
> drivers/net is getting better, but is not clean. I have some patches
> from Arnd which allow W=1 to be enabled by default for subdirectories,
> and i have to skip a few. Also net, not driver/net has problems, which
> i'm working on. I hope Arnd will post his patches soon, so we can get
> them merged and prevent regressions with W=1.

That's odd.  I wonder why I'm not seeing any more issues?

> > Maybe that was down to some of your previous efforts? 
> 
> And Jakub running a bot which compile tests all new patches with W=1.

That's great!  My aim is for all maintainers to be doing that.

> No, not really. I'm a networking guy, so will look mostly at
> drivers/net and the core net code.

Duly noted.  I'll leave 'net' alone then.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog