netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] octeontx2-af: Add devlink health reporters for NIX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+sq2Cc9-vvF8K_FASca5FGYyFc_53QWqyEtoHAx6xVCs41LiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 00:59:35 +0530
From:   Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc:     George Cherian <gcherian@...vell.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
        "masahiroy@...nel.org" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com" <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] octeontx2-af: Add devlink health
 reporters for NIX

> > > > Output:
> > > >  # ./devlink health
> > > >  pci/0002:01:00.0:
> > > >    reporter npa
> > > >      state healthy error 0 recover 0
> > > >    reporter nix
> > > >      state healthy error 0 recover 0
> > > >  # ./devlink  health dump show pci/0002:01:00.0 reporter nix
> > > >   NIX_AF_GENERAL:
> > > >          Memory Fault on NIX_AQ_INST_S read: 0
> > > >          Memory Fault on NIX_AQ_RES_S write: 0
> > > >          AQ Doorbell error: 0
> > > >          Rx on unmapped PF_FUNC: 0
> > > >          Rx multicast replication error: 0
> > > >          Memory fault on NIX_RX_MCE_S read: 0
> > > >          Memory fault on multicast WQE read: 0
> > > >          Memory fault on mirror WQE read: 0
> > > >          Memory fault on mirror pkt write: 0
> > > >          Memory fault on multicast pkt write: 0
> > > >    NIX_AF_RAS:
> > > >          Poisoned data on NIX_AQ_INST_S read: 0
> > > >          Poisoned data on NIX_AQ_RES_S write: 0
> > > >          Poisoned data on HW context read: 0
> > > >          Poisoned data on packet read from mirror buffer: 0
> > > >          Poisoned data on packet read from mcast buffer: 0
> > > >          Poisoned data on WQE read from mirror buffer: 0
> > > >          Poisoned data on WQE read from multicast buffer: 0
> > > >          Poisoned data on NIX_RX_MCE_S read: 0
> > > >    NIX_AF_RVU:
> > > >          Unmap Slot Error: 0
> > > >
> > >
> > > Now i am a little bit skeptic here, devlink health reporter
> > > infrastructure was
> > > never meant to deal with dump op only, the main purpose is to
> > > diagnose/dump and recover.
> > >
> > > especially in your use case where you only report counters, i don't
> > > believe
> > > devlink health dump is a proper interface for this.
> > These are not counters. These are error interrupts raised by HW
> > blocks.
> > The count is provided to understand on how frequently the errors are
> > seen.
> > Error recovery for some of the blocks happen internally. That is the
> > reason,
> > Currently only dump op is added.
>
> So you are counting these events in driver, sounds like a counter to
> me, i really think this shouldn't belong to devlink, unless you really
> utilize devlink health ops for actual reporting and recovery.
>
> what's wrong with just dumping these counters to ethtool ?

This driver is a administrative driver which handles all the resources
in the system and doesn't do any IO.
NIX and NPA are key co-processor blocks which this driver handles.
With NIX and NPA, there are pieces
which gets attached to a PCI device to make it a networking device. We
have netdev drivers registered to this
networking device. Some more information about the drivers is available at
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2.html

So we don't have a netdev here to report these co-processor block
level errors over ethtool.

Thanks,
Sunil.