[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201104173120.0c72d1b1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:31:20 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc: <madalin.bucur@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<florinel.iordache@....com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in
fman_port_probe()
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:23:23 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> @@ -1792,20 +1792,21 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
> if (!fm_node) {
> dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_get_parent() failed\n", __func__);
> err = -ENODEV;
> - goto return_err;
> + goto free_port;
> }
>
> + of_node_put(port_node);
> fm_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(fm_node);
> of_node_put(fm_node);
> if (!fm_pdev) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> - goto return_err;
> + goto free_port;
> }
This is not right either. I just asked you fix up the order of the
error path, not move the of_node_put() in the body of the function.
Now you're releasing the reference on the object and still use it after.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists