netdev - Re: [net-next,v1,4/5] seg6: add support for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13d1b683-de1c-2a6a-4197-e7ba42f6be78@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:16:01 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Shrijeet Mukherjee <shrijeet@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>,
        Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...t.it>,
        Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next,v1,4/5] seg6: add support for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior

On 11/5/20 4:57 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> I spent some time figuring out what happened with this patch. It seems that the
> patchset was not applied by the kernel test robot in the correct order. In
> particular, patch 3 is missing from this build attempt.
> 
> I applied one patch after another in the correct order and, each time, I was
> able to compile the kernel (C=1 W=1) successfully with the .config file provided
> by the robot.

Given that, repost the patch set.

Jakub: if v2 with no changes triggers another build robot message, give
Andrea time to double check whether this problem happened again before
marking it in patchworks. Thanks,