[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201105164733.5d10d899@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:47:33 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com
Cc: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk, edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
alex.aring@...il.com, stefan@...enfreihafen.org, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v4 5/8] net: rds: convert tasklets to use new
tasklet_setup() API
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:48:20 +0530 Allen Pais wrote:
> From: Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>
>
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the
> struct tasklet_struct pointer to all tasklet
> callbacks, switch to using the new tasklet_setup()
> and from_tasklet() to pass the tasklet pointer explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>
Santosh, ack/nack for this going into net-next?
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_cm.c b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
> index b36b60668b1d..d06398be4b80 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib_cm.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
> @@ -314,9 +314,9 @@ static void poll_scq(struct rds_ib_connection *ic, struct ib_cq *cq,
> }
> }
>
> -static void rds_ib_tasklet_fn_send(unsigned long data)
> +static void rds_ib_tasklet_fn_send(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> {
> - struct rds_ib_connection *ic = (struct rds_ib_connection *)data;
> + struct rds_ib_connection *ic = from_tasklet(ic, t, i_send_tasklet);
> struct rds_connection *conn = ic->conn;
>
> rds_ib_stats_inc(s_ib_tasklet_call);
> @@ -354,9 +354,9 @@ static void poll_rcq(struct rds_ib_connection *ic, struct ib_cq *cq,
> }
> }
>
> -static void rds_ib_tasklet_fn_recv(unsigned long data)
> +static void rds_ib_tasklet_fn_recv(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> {
> - struct rds_ib_connection *ic = (struct rds_ib_connection *)data;
> + struct rds_ib_connection *ic = from_tasklet(ic, t, i_recv_tasklet);
> struct rds_connection *conn = ic->conn;
> struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev = ic->rds_ibdev;
> struct rds_ib_ack_state state;
> @@ -1219,10 +1219,8 @@ int rds_ib_conn_alloc(struct rds_connection *conn, gfp_t gfp)
> }
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ic->ib_node);
> - tasklet_init(&ic->i_send_tasklet, rds_ib_tasklet_fn_send,
> - (unsigned long)ic);
> - tasklet_init(&ic->i_recv_tasklet, rds_ib_tasklet_fn_recv,
> - (unsigned long)ic);
> + tasklet_setup(&ic->i_send_tasklet, rds_ib_tasklet_fn_send);
> + tasklet_setup(&ic->i_recv_tasklet, rds_ib_tasklet_fn_recv);
> mutex_init(&ic->i_recv_mutex);
> #ifndef KERNEL_HAS_ATOMIC64
> spin_lock_init(&ic->i_ack_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists