netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Allow using bpf_sk_storage in FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201106231639.ipyrsxjj3jduw7f6@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 15:18:27 -0800
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
CC:     "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: Allow using bpf_sk_storage in
 FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 02:59:14PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Nov 6, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
> > 
> > This patch enables the FENTRY/FEXIT/RAW_TP tracing program to use
> > the bpf_sk_storage_(get|delete) helper, so those tracing programs
> > can access the sk's bpf_local_storage and the later selftest
> > will show some examples.
> > 
> > The bpf_sk_storage is currently used in bpf-tcp-cc, tc,
> > cg sockops...etc which is running either in softirq or
> > task context.
> > 
> > This patch adds bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing_proto and
> > bpf_sk_storage_delete_tracing_proto.  They will check
> > in runtime that the helpers can only be called when serving
> > softirq or running in a task context.  That should enable
> > most common tracing use cases on sk.
> > 
> > During the load time, the new tracing_allowed() function
> > will ensure the tracing prog using the bpf_sk_storage_(get|delete)
> > helper is not tracing any *sk_storage*() function itself.
> > The sk is passed as "void *" when calling into bpf_local_storage.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> > ---
> > include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h |  2 +
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c     |  5 +++
> > net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c    | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h b/include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h
> > index 3c516dd07caf..0e85713f56df 100644
> > --- a/include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h
> > +++ b/include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h
> > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ void bpf_sk_storage_free(struct sock *sk);
> > 
> > extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_storage_get_proto;
> > extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_storage_delete_proto;
> > +extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing_proto;
> > +extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_storage_delete_tracing_proto;
> > 
> > struct bpf_local_storage_elem;
> > struct bpf_sk_storage_diag;
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index e4515b0f62a8..cfce60ad1cb5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> > #include <linux/error-injection.h>
> > #include <linux/btf_ids.h>
> > +#include <net/bpf_sk_storage.h>
> > 
> > #include <uapi/linux/bpf.h>
> > #include <uapi/linux/btf.h>
> > @@ -1735,6 +1736,10 @@ tracing_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > 		return &bpf_skc_to_tcp_request_sock_proto;
> > 	case BPF_FUNC_skc_to_udp6_sock:
> > 		return &bpf_skc_to_udp6_sock_proto;
> > +	case BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_get:
> > +		return &bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing_proto;
> > +	case BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_delete:
> > +		return &bpf_sk_storage_delete_tracing_proto;
> > #endif
> > 	case BPF_FUNC_seq_printf:
> > 		return prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_ITER ?
> > diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> > index 001eac65e40f..1a41c917e08d 100644
> > --- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> > +++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > #include <linux/bpf.h>
> > +#include <linux/btf.h>
> > #include <linux/btf_ids.h>
> > #include <linux/bpf_local_storage.h>
> > #include <net/bpf_sk_storage.h>
> > @@ -378,6 +379,78 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_storage_delete_proto = {
> > 	.arg2_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_SOCK_COMMON,
> > };
> > 
> > +static bool bpf_sk_storage_tracing_allowed(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > +{
> > +	const struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
> > +	const struct btf_type *t;
> > +	const char *tname;
> > +	u32 btf_id;
> > +
> > +	if (prog->aux->dst_prog)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	/* Ensure the tracing program is not tracing
> > +	 * any *sk_storage*() function and also
> > +	 * use the bpf_sk_storage_(get|delete) helper.
> > +	 */
> > +	switch (prog->expected_attach_type) {
> > +	case BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP:
> > +		/* bpf_sk_storage has no trace point */
> > +		return true;
> > +	case BPF_TRACE_FENTRY:
> > +	case BPF_TRACE_FEXIT:
> > +		btf_vmlinux = bpf_get_btf_vmlinux();
> > +		btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
> > +		t = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux, btf_id);
> 
> What happens to fentry/fexit attach to other BPF programs? I guess
> we should check for t == NULL?
It does not support tracing BPF program and using bpf_sk_storage
at the same time for now, so there is a "if (prog->aux->dst_prog)" test earlier.
It could be extended to do it later as a follow up.
I missed to mention that in the commit message.  

"t" should not be NULL here when tracing a kernel function.
The verifier should have already checked it and ensured "t" is a FUNC.

> > +		tname = btf_name_by_offset(btf_vmlinux, t->name_off);
> > +		return !strstr(tname, "sk_storage");
> > +	default:
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> 
> [...]
> 
>