netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftest/bpf: remove unused bpf tunnel testing code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201106080411.GU2531@dhcp-12-153.nay.redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:04:11 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To:     Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftest/bpf: remove unused bpf tunnel
 testing code

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:55:47PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > > -	key.remote_ipv6[0] = bpf_htonl(0x2401db00);
> > > -	key.tunnel_ttl = 64;
> 
> The code logic is same. It set tunnel remote addr to dst IPv6 address, as
> they are both testing IP(v4 or v6) over IPv6 tunnel.

OK, I decide to keep the kernel ip6ip6 code as using ipip6_set_tunnel obj in
ip6ip6 testing may cause user confused.

Thanks
Hangbin