lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <91259ce4-173e-a4fa-b28a-ace99e7ca004@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:35:05 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     kernel@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>,
        kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net 21/27] can: mcp251xfd: mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(): increase
 severity of CRC read error messages

On 11/5/20 7:14 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 05:39:31PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 11/5/20 5:24 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> Hi Marc,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 11:06:30PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>> During debugging it turned out that some people have setups where the SPI
>>>> communication is more prone to CRC errors.
>>>>
>>>> Increase the severity of both the transfer retry and transfer failure message
>>>> to give users feedback without the need to recompile the driver with debug
>>>> enabled.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>
>>>> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20201019190524.1285319-15-mkl@pengutronix.de
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c
>>>> index ba25902dd78c..c9ffc5ea2b25 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-regmap.c
>>>> @@ -330,17 +330,17 @@ mcp251xfd_regmap_crc_read(void *context,
>>>>  			goto out;
>>>>  		}
>>>>  
>>>> -		netdev_dbg(priv->ndev,
>>>> -			   "CRC read error at address 0x%04x (length=%zd, data=%*ph, CRC=0x%04x) retrying.\n",
>>>> -			   reg, val_len, (int)val_len, buf_rx->data,
>>>> -			   get_unaligned_be16(buf_rx->data + val_len));
>>>> -	}
>>>> -
>>>> -	if (err) {
>>>>  		netdev_info(priv->ndev,
>>>> -			    "CRC read error at address 0x%04x (length=%zd, data=%*ph, CRC=0x%04x).\n",
>>>> +			    "CRC read error at address 0x%04x (length=%zd, data=%*ph, CRC=0x%04x) retrying.\n",
>>>>  			    reg, val_len, (int)val_len, buf_rx->data,
>>>>  			    get_unaligned_be16(buf_rx->data + val_len));
>>>
>>> I'm not finding this inner debug log useful. Does the user really care
>>> about the iterations it took to read a register? Just throwing the error
>>> after max try seems better to me.
>>
>> Bitflips on the SPI should not happen, at least not regularly. Even with my
>> breadboard setup and max SPI frequency, I don't see any SPI CRC errors, unless
>> there is bad cabling. Then a retry most of the times helps and the user doesn't
>> notice. This drops performance...Yes logging drop performance, too, but at least
>> someone will notice.
>>
>> My rationale was to give the user feedback and not cover a potential problem.
>> The driver is new and probably not widely used and I have no idea how often it
>> runs into read-CRC problems in production use.
>>
> 
> Okay. Let's see if anyone complain ;)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>

The patch is part of my pull request and has already been merged by Jakub to
net/master.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ