netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] bonding: rename bond components

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 18:44:32 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] bonding: rename bond components

On Fri,  6 Nov 2020 15:04:31 -0500 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> The bonding driver's use of master and slave, while largely understood
> in technical circles, poses a barrier for inclusion to some potential
> members of the development and user community, due to the historical
> context of masters and slaves, particularly in the United States. This
> is a first full pass at replacing those phrases with more socially
> inclusive ones, opting for bond to replace master and port to
> replace slave, which is congruent with the bridge and team drivers.

If we decide to go ahead with this, we should probably also use it as
an opportunity to clean up the more egregious checkpatch warnings, WDYT?

Plan minimum - don't add new ones ;)