netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/dsa: remove unused macros to tame gcc warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 7 Nov 2020 20:54:53 +0800
From:   Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/dsa: remove unused macros to tame gcc warning



在 2020/11/7 上午12:39, Florian Fainelli 写道:
>> Hi Alex
>>
>> It is good to remember that there are multiple readers of source
>> files. There is the compiler which generates code from it, and there
>> is the human trying to understand what is going on, what the hardware
>> can do, how we could maybe extend the code in the future to make use
>> of bits are currently don't, etc.
>>
>> The compiler has no use of these macros, at the moment. But i as a
>> human do. It is valuable documentation, given that there is no open
>> datasheet for this hardware.
>>
>> I would say these warnings are bogus, and the code should be left
>> alone.
> Agreed, these definitions are intended to document what the hardware
> does. These warnings are getting too far.
> -- 

Thanks for all comments! I agree these info are much meaningful.
Is there other way to tame the gcc warning? like put them into a .h file
or covered by comments?

Thanks
Alex