Message-ID: <0f736cff81274310a3dd7c174af4ede4@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:19:56 +0000
From:   zhangqilong <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "fugang.duan@....com" <fugang.duan@....com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH 1/2] PM: runtime: Add a general runtime get sync operation to deal with usage counter

> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:46 PM zhangqilong <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 2:24 PM zhangqilong <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:05 AM Zhang Qilong
> > > > > <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In many case, we need to check return value of
> > > > > > pm_runtime_get_sync, but it brings a trouble to the usage
> > > > > > counter processing. Many callers forget to decrease the usage
> > > > > > counter when it failed. It has been discussed a lot[0][1]. So
> > > > > > we add a function to deal with the usage counter for better coding.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [0]https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/14/88
> > > > > > [1]https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/2020
> > > > > > 0520
> > > > > > 0951 48.10995-1-dinghao.liu@....edu.cn/
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@...wei.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 32
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> > > > > > b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h index 4b708f4e8eed..2b0af5b1dffd
> > > > > > 100644
> > > > > > --- a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> > > > > > @@ -386,6 +386,38 @@ static inline int
> > > > > > pm_runtime_get_sync(struct device
> > > > > *dev)
> > > > > >         return __pm_runtime_resume(dev, RPM_GET_PUT);  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +/**
> > > > > > + * gene_pm_runtime_get_sync - Bump up usage counter of a
> > > > > > +device and
> > > > > resume it.
> > > > > > + * @dev: Target device.
> > > > >
> > > > > The force argument is not documented.
> > > >
> > > > (1) Good catch, I will add it in next version.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Increase runtime PM usage counter of @dev first, and carry
> > > > > > + out runtime-resume
> > > > > > + * of it synchronously. If __pm_runtime_resume return
> > > > > > + negative value(device is in
> > > > > > + * error state) or return positive value(the runtime of
> > > > > > + device is already active)
> > > > > > + * with force is true, it need decrease the usage counter of
> > > > > > + the device when
> > > > > > + * return.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * The possible return values of this function is zero or negative value.
> > > > > > + * zero:
> > > > > > + *    - it means success and the status will store the resume
> operation
> > > > > status
> > > > > > + *      if needed, the runtime PM usage counter of @dev remains
> > > > > incremented.
> > > > > > + * negative:
> > > > > > + *    - it means failure and the runtime PM usage counter of @dev
> has
> > > > > been
> > > > > > + *      decreased.
> > > > > > + * positive:
> > > > > > + *    - it means the runtime of the device is already active before
> that.
> > > If
> > > > > > + *      caller set force to true, we still need to decrease the usage
> > > > > counter.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why is this needed?
> > > >
> > > > (2) If caller set force, it means caller will return even the
> > > > device has already been active (__pm_runtime_resume return
> > > > positive value) after calling gene_pm_runtime_get_sync, we still
> > > > need to decrease the
> > > usage count.
> > >
> > > But who needs this?
> > >
> > > I don't think that it is a good idea to complicate the API this way.
> >
> > The callers like:
> > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > if (ret) {
> >         ...
> >         return (xxx);
> > }
> 
> Which isn't correct really, is it?
> 
> If ret is greater than 0, the error should not be returned in the first place, so
> you may want the new wrapper to return zero in that case instead.

I get your idea.

> 
> > drivers/spi/spi-img-spfi.c:734 img_spfi_resume() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:49 arizona_clk32k_enable() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-pci.c:212 dwc3_pci_resume_work() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/input/keyboard/omap4-keypad.c:279 omap4_keypad_probe() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c:839 vc4_dsi_encoder_enable() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gem_device.c:157 mock_gem_device()
> > warn: 'pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev)' returns positive and negative
> > drivers/watchdog/rti_wdt.c:230 rti_wdt_probe() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/mipi-csis.c:513 s5pcsis_s_stream()
> > warn: pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_pm.c:89
> > mtk_vcodec_dec_pw_on() warn: pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on
> > success
> > drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c:794 cal_probe() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c:2478 vpe_runtime_get() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success
> > drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c:1529 smiapp_pm_get_init() warn:
> > pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success ...
> > they need it to simplify the function.
> >
> > If we only want to simplify like
> > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> >         ...
> >         Return (xxx)
> > }
> > The parameter force could be removed.
> 
> Which is exactly my point.

OK, I re-code it next version.

Thanks,
Zhang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists